After doing the group activity on Wednesday, I reflected on
how important and useful it is to understand genres and how they are formed.
After the groups were all given random genres to write about using the same
topic, we were all able to nail It, even if it wasn’t a genre that we had much
experience with. Because we had taken the time to identify the audience,
understand the purpose of the writing, and analyze other conventions of our
given genre, we were able to successfully create a work of that genre from a simple
prompt. I then considered how understanding how to apply genres can be
extremely useful in every day life. Throughout my life, I will have to write
countless things for many different occasions, and will have to know how to use
language to my advantage. For example, I could need to write a letter to my
landlord about fixing a problem in my house, or an email to my coworkers about
cleaning up after themselves in the employee lounge. That being said, knowing
how to navigate through genres will better help me achieve my goals in writing
and use the most fitting language for the situation I am in. No matter the
scenario, it is important to understand the expectations that come with writing
certain genres and be able to apply rhetoric in a way that will elicit a
desired response.
Saturday, January 30, 2016
Saturday, January 23, 2016
Thlog 3: Audience and Peer Reviewing
After finishing up my first writing
project, I reflected on my work and tried to think of the most important thing
I had learned from it. I finally concluded that the single biggest thing I took
away from this project was how much audience influences a genre. Between all
three of my pasta recipes, most of the variation was because of the different
audiences. The audiences had an impact on how the recipe was formatted, worded,
etc. As Losh and Alexander said, everything you write is “influenced by what
you know about the audience’s expectations” (7). Audience is crucial to writing
a genre because certain rhetorical strategies work better with specific groups
of people. Understanding who you’re writing to and their expectations can
better help you achieve your goals because you can write in a way that you know
will elicit a desired response.
Besides learning about audience, I
gained valuable knowledge on how to peer review an essay. The reading “Responding
to Other Student’s Writing” by Richard Straub really helped me because in the
past I have been overly critical when grading other student’s essays and not
given enough support or positive feedback. The reading told me not to sound
like a “teacher” or “judge” (19). I really let those words sink in and resonate
through my mind when we did the peer editing in class. I tried to ask questions
and be positive but also offer advice. I gave reasoning for everything that I
wrote so that the actual concept would make sense to the reader and he could
understand why it should be fixed. Responding to my classmate’s essays also
gave me a better understanding of what we were learning and gave me some ideas
about what I could fix on my own paper.
Friday, January 15, 2016
Thlog 2: Understanding Rhetorical Context
After reading “Backpacks to Briefcases: Steps Toward
Rhetorical Analysis,” I felt that I had a much better understanding of genres. In
the beginning of reading, Carroll compared a rhetorical analysis to the way we
draw on our mental database to “make conclusions about what a person’s looks
tell you about their personality” (Carroll 46). We are able to identify a genre
by quickly analyzing a work’s conventions. Getting good at identifying genres
in readings, movies, etc. could help us when making “savvy judgments” (Carroll
46) in situations we encounter in real life. Carroll’s article also provided me
with useful information about exigence, audience, and constraints – the keys to
understanding the context of a rhetorical situation. Exigence is the “circumstance
or condition that invites a response” (Carroll 48). In other words, you can
think of exigence as the cause of a response, or why you’re writing in the
first place. The audience is the people what will be viewing your work,
intentionally or not. It is important to make your audience people that “should
be able to help address the problem” (Carroll 49). You wouldn’t write a letter
complaining about a restaurant worker to your cousin, but instead to maybe the
manager of the facility, or customer service. In addition, identifying the
audience that you are addressing is key in choosing the best type of language
to use for your argument. Then there are constraints. Constraints are like the
limitations of a genre; they could be a word limit on an essay or how formal
you must be when writing to one of your professors. Although not mentioned in
Carroll’s article, there are also allowances, which are essentially the
opposites of constraints. Allowances are like things you can get away with in writing
due to the situation, such as how casual you can be when writing to an
immediate family member. Being able to understand exigence, the audience,
constraints, and allowances is an important factor in being able to identify
and analyze genre and can help you immensely.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)